1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 36 S.W.3d
  5. 36 S.W.3d 351 (2001)
 

MURPHY v. DUMAS

No. 00-1411.

36 S.W.3d 351 (2001)

343 Ark. 608

Robert MURPHY and Cathy Murphy, His Wife; Billy Joe Campbell and Margaret Ann Campbell, His Wife; Edward Ginger and Brenda Ginger, His Wife; John Lee Cottrell and Delphine Cottrell, His Wife; Ray Kinley and Sandra Kinley, His Wife; Charles Ray and Patricia Ray, His Wife; and Richard Ray and Cheryl Ray, His Wife v. David M. DUMAS and Donnie S. Dumas, His Wife.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 1, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Bennett, El Dorado, for appellants.

Harrell & Lindsey, P.A., by Paul E. Lindsey, Camden, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellees David M. Dumas and Donnie S. Dumas (the Dumases) move this court to dismiss the appeal of appellants Robert Murphy, Cathy Murphy, and others (the Murphys) due to a late filing of the record on appeal in violation of Ark.R.App.P.— Civ. 5(a). We agree that the trial court erred in granting the extension of time, but we deny the motion to dismiss.

The facts are that on July 28, 2000, the Murphys timely filed their notice of appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases