1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 48 S.W.3d
  5. 48 S.W.3d 332 (2001)
 

BALL v. RAO

No. 2-99-400-CV.

48 S.W.3d 332 (2001)

Roland and Gayle BALL, McKool Smith, P.C., and Eric W. Buether, Appellants, v. Len and Kelly RAO, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Rehearing Overruled July 12, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McKool Smith, P.C., Eric W. Buether, Dallas, for Appellants.

McCauley, MacDonald, Devin & Huddleston, P.C., D. Mark Davis, Amy S. Harris, and Chad M. Ruback, Dallas, for Appellees.

Panel B: DAY, LIVINGSTON, and GARDNER, JJ.

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Introduction

Roland and Gayle Ball sued Len and Kelly Rao to stop the Raos' construction of a fence between the parties' yards. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the Raos' motion, denied the Balls' motion, and assessed sanctions against both the Balls and their trial counsel, McKool Smith, P.C. and Eric W. Buether, for violations of the rules of civil procedure and the civil practice and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases