HOUGH v. BALLARD

No. 25411-5-II.

31 P.3d 6 (2001)

Lawerence R. HOUGH and Ethel Hough, husband and wife; and Roberta Hough, a single person, Respondent, v. Robin S. BALLARD and "Jane Doe" Ballard, husband and wife, and the marital community consisting thereof, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

August 31, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Michael Jacobi, Wilson Smith Cochran & Dickerson, Seattle, for Appellants.

Mark W. Conforti, William M. Wood, Meikle & Wood, Tacoma, Raymond W. Schutts, Spokane, for Respondents.


HUNT, A.C.J.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Robin S. Ballard appeals partial summary judgment in favor of Lawerence R. Hough in a tort action arising from a nighttime collision at an intersection with inoperative traffic lights. The trial court ruled as a matter of law that Ballard was 100 percent liable because Hough was the favored driver. Because there are material issues of fact concerning the cause of the accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases