Respondent's determination disapproving petitioner's application for a pistol license was properly left undisturbed by the article 78 court. Given petitioner's history of cerebral vascular episodes and his present physical limitations which might impair his ability to use a firearm safely, the challenged pistol license application disapproval was entirely rational and consistent with respondent's role in protecting the public (see, Matter of Harris v Codd,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
