The grant of plaintiff's motion to strike defendant Sivaco's answer unless Sivaco complies with court-ordered discovery was proper. Contrary to Sivaco's contention, it is not entitled to a protective order shielding the material sought from production. Plaintiff was allegedly injured when wire manufactured and spooled by Sivaco became tangled while being unspooled at plaintiff's place of work, and snapped, hitting
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.