HOOD RIVER COUNTY v. STEVENSON

00-0046DG; A110943.

33 P.3d 325 (2001)

177 Or. App. 78

HOOD RIVER COUNTY, Respondent, v. Mo STEVENSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Babcock, Sherwood, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before LINDER, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge.


LINDER, P.J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of the Hood River County Circuit Court concluding that she had violated a county ordinance that prohibits the keeping of a vicious or dangerous dog and ordering that the dog be destroyed. Defendant argues that the order is void because the person who initiated the complaint and prosecuted the violation, Farber, was not authorized to bring such an action. We agree and accordingly vacate the judgment.

The pertinent facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases