The court properly exercised its discretion in employing a screening procedure to control access to the courtroom during the undercover officer's testimony in light of the officer's Hinton hearing testimony that he was to continue working in the area of defendant's arrest, that he had cases pending in the same courthouse, that he had received threats in the past, that he feared for his safety and the integrity of his ongoing operations, and that he always employed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
