Defendant's appellate argument that he was improperly adjudicated a persistent violent felony offender became moot when defendant was re-adjudicated a persistent violent felony offender using a new information that fully complied with CPL 400.16.
The arguments raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief are entirely unsubstantiated and are based on factual assertions
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.