Given the cross-examination by defense counsel and cocounsel, which clearly raised specific claims of recent fabrication, the court properly admitted various reports prepared by the undercover detective as prior consistent statements to rebut such claims (see, People v McDaniel,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.