Defendant, who successfully moved for suppression of his statements made prior to Miranda warnings, argues for the first time on appeal that his post-Miranda statements should also have been suppressed as part of a continuous interrogation. However, at the hearing, defendant expressly limited his suppression motion to the pre-Miranda statements and the record does not establish that "in response to a protest by a party, the court expressly decided the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
