1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 289 A.D.2d
  5. 289 A.D.2d 26 (2001)
 

LIPORACE v. BASKSHI

289 A.D.2d 26 (2001)

733 N.Y.S.2d 861

MARIA LIPORACE, Plaintiff, and RALPH LIPORACE, Appellant, v. SHEIKH M. BASKSHI et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 4, 2001.

The admissible evidence set forth in opposition to defendants' motion by plaintiff Ralph Liporace, which included no quantified findings as to any permanent consequential or significant physical limitation suffered by Mr. Liporace, was insufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether his injuries met the serious injury threshold of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Foley v Karvelis, 276 A.D.2d 666; Sherlock v Smith, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases