AT&T COM. OF SOUTHWEST v. ARK. PUBLIC SER.

No. 99-860.

40 S.W.3d 273 (2001)

344 Ark. 188

AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. v. ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 22, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP, by N.M. Norton and J. Mark Davis, Little Rock, for appellant.

Paul J. Ward, Little Rock, for appellee Arkansas Public Service Commission.

Timothy S. Pickering, Little Rock, for appellee Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.

Chisenhall, Nestrud & Julian, P.A., by Lawrence E. Chisenhall, Jr., and Michael T. Jackson, Little Rock, for appellees Arkansas Telephone Company, Inc.; Century Telephone of Arkansas, Inc.; Century Telephone of Mountain Home, Inc.; Century Telephone of Redfield, Inc.; Century Telephone of South Arkansas, Inc.; Cleveland County Telephone Company; Decatur Telephone Company; Mountain View Telephone Company; Prairie Grove Telephone Company; E. Ritter Telephone Company; South Arkansas Telephone Company; Tri-County Telephone Company; Yelcot Telephone Company; Yell County Telephone Company.

Gill Law Firm, by W.W. Elrod II, Little Rock, for appellees/cross-appellants Madison County Telephone Company, Inc., and Scott County Telephone Company, Inc.

George Hopkins, Melvern; and Williams & Anderson LLP, by Leon Holmes, Little Rock, for appellees/cross-appellants Central Arkansas Telephone Cooperative, Inc.; Lavaca Telephone Company, Inc.; Magazine Telephone Company, Inc.; Northern Arkansas Telephone Company, Inc.; Southwest Arkansas Telephone Company, Inc.; Walnut Hill Telephone Company, Inc.

Stephen B. Rowell; and Friday, Eldredge & Clark, by Kevin A. Crass, Little Rock, for cross-appellees Alltel Arkansas, Inc.; Alltel Mobile Communications, Inc.; and Alltel Communications, Inc.


TOM GLAZE, Justice.

AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., brings this appeal from Order No. 12 of the Arkansas Public Service Commission (the PSC or the Commission), in which the Commission made certain determinations with respect to the Arkansas Universal Service Fund ("AUSF"). AT & T initially appealed to the court of appeals, which upheld the Commission's order. See AT&T Communications of Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Com'n,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases