1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 105 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 208 (2001)
 

ROMO v. Y-3 HOLDINGS, INC.

No. B136617.

105 Cal.Rptr.2d 208 (2001)

87 Cal.App.4th 1153

Lupe S. ROMO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Y-3 HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

March 20, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Daniel Parker Jett and John L. Barber, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants.

Gail C. Kaplan, Santa Monica; Pine & Pine and Norman Pine, Encino, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

HASTINGS, J.

Appellants Y-3 Holdings, Inc. and Merv York appeal from an order denying arbitration of a lawsuit filed by respondent, exemployee Lupe S. Romo, arising from termination of her employment. We conclude that the trial court did not err in concluding no agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties, and we affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Respondent was continuously employed by appellants from April 3, 1980, through her firing on May 15,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases