HIGHTOWER v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B143841.

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 209 (2001)

86 Cal.App.4th 1415

Glenn HIGHTOWER, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent. Daniel O'Dowd, Real Party In Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing February 28, 2001.

Review Denied May 16, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, Harold A. Barza and Edith Ramirez, Los Angeles; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Robin Meadow, Beverly Hills, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Bryan Cave and Frank E. Merideth, Jr., Santa Monica, for Real Party in Interest.


CROSKEY, J.

In this writ proceeding, we examine the question of whether an arbitrator, in order to provide a proper remedy for the prevailing party, may resolve certain critical areas of a dispute in a "partial final award" but reserve jurisdiction to later decide, by a "final award," issues which will likely arise as a result of the implementation of that remedy. In the specific factual context of this case, we answer that question in the affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases