1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 17 P.3d
  5. 17 P.3d 292 (2001)
 

STATE v. MONTGOMERY

No. 24670.

17 P.3d 292 (2001)

135 Idaho 348

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lon Eugene MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, September 2000 Term.

January 4, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roark Law Firm, Hailey; Hampton & Elliott, Boise, for appellant. R. Keith Roark argued.

Hon. Alan G. Lance, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Alison A. Stieglitz argued.

KIDWELL, Justice.

Lon Eugene Montgomery appeals from an entry of a conditional plea and judgment for racketeering in violation of Idaho Code § 18-7803. Montgomery asserts the district court incorrectly found that the Idaho Securities Act does not require an intent to defraud or deceive in order to establish select securities violations codified within the Act. The order of the district court is affirmed.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases