MATTER OF WISEHART


281 A.D.2d 23 (2001)

721 N.Y.S.2d 356

In the Matter of ARTHUR M. WISEHART (Admitted as ARTHUR McKEE WISEHART), an Attorney, Respondent. DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 8, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andral N. Bratton of counsel (Thomas J. Cahill, attorney), for petitioner.

Michael A. Gentile of counsel (Gentile, Brotman, Maltz & Benjamin, attorneys), for respondent.

NARDELLI, J. P., WILLIAMS, ELLERIN, LERNER and RUBIN, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Arthur M. Wisehart was admitted to practice in the State of New York in 1955 and has maintained a law office in the First Judicial Department at all times relevant to these charges.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order confirming the Hearing Panel report that sustained, partially or fully, four of eight charges of misconduct brought against respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases