The court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiffs' motion to restore since their papers establish that they have a meritorious cause of action; that they did not intend to deliberately abandon the case; that the conduct of their attorneys constituted a reasonable excuse for their delay in moving to restore; and that defendants have not been prejudiced (see, Palermo v Lord & Taylor,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WILLIAMS v. FOREST CITY ALBEE SQUARE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
289 A.D.2d 2 (2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 601
SAFIRE WILLIAMS et al., Respondents, v. FOREST CITY ALBEE SQUARE ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 4, 2001.
Decided December 4, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
