1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 130 F.Supp.2d
  5. 130 F.Supp.2d 157 (2001)
 

COHESIVE TECHNOLOGIES v. WATERS CORP.

No. Civ.A. 99-11528-REK.

130 F.Supp.2d 157 (2001)

COHESIVE TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff, v. WATERS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 9, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Barry, Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen, Boston, MA, Robert H. Stier, Jr., Pierce Atwood, Portland, ME, Peter S. Black, Pierce Atwood, Portland, ME, for Cohesive Technologies, Inc., plaintiff.

John L. Welch, Ann Lamport Hammitte, Timothy J. Douros, William A. Scofield, Jr., Ralph A. Loren, Ann T. Lamport, Lahive & Cockfield, Boston, MA, Anthony J. Janiuk, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, for Waters Corporation, defendant.

Opinion and Order

KEETON, District Judge.

I.

Pending on the docket in this case are the following motions:

(1) Motion For Partial Summary Judgment That the '368 Patent is Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (Docket No. 45, filed October 31, 2000);

(2) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That Waters Has Infringed the '368 Patent (Docket No. 48, filed October 31, 2000);

(3) Defendant Waters Corporation's Motion for Summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases