1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 93 Ohio
  5. 93 Ohio St.3d 189 (2001)
 

STATE EX REL. HOBART CORP./PMI FOOD EQUIP. GROUP v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 01-256.

93 Ohio St.3d 189 (2001)

THE STATE EX REL. HOBART CORPORATION/PMI FOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 19, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky, Fitzgerald & Theis Co., L.P.A., and John Tarkowsky, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jeffrey B. Hartranft, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellee Douglas E. Moerch.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.

I dissent and would grant the requested writ of mandamus and return the matter to the Industrial Commission for reconsideration. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases