1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 63 Conn.
  5. 63 Conn. App. 216 (2001)
 

RUND v. MELILLO

(AC 20200)

63 Conn. App. 216 (2001)

WILLIAM RUND ET AL. v. MICHAEL MELILLO ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released May 1, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen R. Bellis, with whom, on the brief, was Daren Grove, for the appellant (named defendant).

Joshua A. Hawks-Ladds, with whom, on the brief, was Gwen P. Weisberg, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Schaller, Spear and O'Connell, Js.

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant Michael Melillo appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, William Rund and Professional Ventures, Inc. (Professional), in this breach of contract action. On appeal, Melillo claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the contract was ambiguous regarding whether the parties had bound themselves, both in an individual and corporate

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases