FLOAT-RITE PARK, INC. v. VILLAGE OF SOMERSET

No. 00-1610.

244 Wis.2d 34 (2001)

2001 WI App 113

629 N.W.2d 818

FLOAT-RITE PARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, William MAGNUSON, Plaintiff-Co-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF SOMERSET, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant and plaintiff-co-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Matthew A. Biegert of Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C. of New Richmond.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Timothy A. Yanacheck of Law Offices of Stilp & Cotton of Madison.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.


¶ 1. CANE, C.J.

Float-Rite Park, Inc. and one of its patrons, William Magnuson (collectively, Float-Rite), appeal from orders dismissing their actions seeking a declaration that a Village of Somerset ordinance provision is unconstitutional. The sole issue is whether the provision, which allows law enforcement and others to enter the premises of licensed innertube rental businesses, is unconstitutional on its face. Because the ordinance is in harmony with accepted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases