1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 105 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 147 (2001)
 

CAPPIELLO, HOFMANN & KATZ v. BOYLE

No. A089477.

105 Cal.Rptr.2d 147 (2001)

87 Cal.App.4th 1064

CAPPIELLO, HOFMANN & KATZ, P.C., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Thomas J. BOYLE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

Ordered Not Officially Published July 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Thomas J. Boyle and Thomas J. Boyle, San Francisco, and W. Ruel Walker, for Appellant.

Mathew Stephenson, Kochan & Stephenson, for Respondent.

PARRILLI, J.

It is settled that interference with an unenforceable contract may give rise to liability in tort for interference with prospective economic advantage. This case demonstrates a qualification of that rule. If a contract is unenforceable because it is illegal, it cannot give rise to a claim for interference with prospective economic advantage.

The law firm of Cappiello, Hofmann & Katz, P.C. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases