1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 112 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 127 (2001)
 

IN RE MARRIAGE OF HARRIS

No. D036144.

112 Cal.Rptr.2d 127 (2001)

92 Cal.App.4th 499

In re the MARRIAGE of Karen and Charles Erik HARRIS. Karen Butler, Appellant, v. Charles Erik Harris et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Rehearing Denied October 15, 2001.

Review Granted January 3, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Jeffrey W. Doeringer, Family Law Appellate Associates, Jeffrey W. Doeringer, Huntington Beach, for Appellant.

Karen A. Wyle, Julie E. Mumma, Sacramento, Guralnick & Gilliland and Anne L. Rauch, San Diego, for Coalition for Restoration of Parental Rights as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Martha Matthews, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Los Angeles, Charles A. Bird, San Diego, Jordan C. Budd, Joan H. Hollinger, Shannon Minter and Shannan Wilber, San Francisco, for the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, ACLU Foundation of San Diego and Imperial Counties, Child Advocacy Program Law School—Boalt Hall, National Center for Lesbian Rights and the Youth Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Law Offices of Paul W. Leehey, Paul W. Leehey for Respondents.

William Wesley Patton as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondents.

David Borges; Law Offices of Gollub & Golsan, Lorraine Gollub, Culver City; Cooper-Gordon, Freida Gordon; Dawn Gray, Grass Valley; and Stephen Temko for the Association of Certified Family Law Specialists as Amicus Curiae upon the request of the Court of Appeal.

Lawrence E. Fluharty for the Los Angeles Chapter of the National Association of Counsel for Children as Amicus Curiae.

Myron Dean Quon and Patricia M. Logue for Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. as Amicus Curiae.

HALLER, J.

Karen Butler, the mother of Emily, appeals an order granting and extending visitation to Emily's paternal grandparents, Charles Harris, Jr., and Leanne Harris, and directing Butler to allow her daughter to travel alone on airline flights to accomplish the visitation. Butler asserts the visitation order must be reversed because the statute that authorized it—Family Code1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases