1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 103 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 131 (2001)
 

BIRD v. SAENZ

No. B134886.

103 Cal.Rptr.2d 131 (2001)

86 Cal.App.4th 167

Janice BIRD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Rolando SAENZ et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

Review Granted May 16, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven G. Cohn, Sacramento, a Law Corporation, and Steven G. Cohn for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Schmid & Voiles and Suzanne De Rosa, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents Rolando Saenz and David M. Fung.

Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols, David J. O'Keefe, Patricia Egan Daehnke, and Michael A. Gregg, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Scott M. Eisenkop.

LILLIE, P.J.

Plaintiffs Janice Bird, Dayle Edgmon, and Kim Moran, three daughters of decedent Nita Bird, appeal from judgment of dismissal after the court granted summary adjudication of issues in favor of three doctors who treated Nita Bird. Given that triable issues of fact exist with respect to the causes of action for wrongful death and negligent infliction of emotional distress, judgment of dismissal was improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases