Rutberg, J.
This appeal comes to us on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8B; however, the appellant failed to preserve his appellate rights. Stigum v. Skloff, 433 Mass. 1011 (2001). All but one of appellant's requests for rulings of law were deemed waived by the trial judge as he found them "... not in compliance with [MRCP] Rule 64A(a). ..." The remaining ruling that was not deemed waived was allowed. Although...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
