1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 48 S.W.3d
  5. 48 S.W.3d 174 (2001)
 

NUÑEZ v. CALDAROLA

No. 99-1075.

48 S.W.3d 174 (2001)

Serafin NUÑEZ and Paulina Nuñez, Petitioners, v. Gayle CALDAROLA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Harris, Andrew M. Greenwell, Harris & Greenwell, Corpus Christi, for Petitioners.

Ronald B. Brin, Thomas F. Nye, Linda C. Breck, Brin & Brin, Gilberto Hinojosa, Magallanes & Hinojosa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

One of the issues in this legal-malpractice case is whether the rule we announced in Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins, 821 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.1991), tolled the statute of limitations on the plaintiffs' claims. The court of appeals held that it did not, and affirmed a summary judgment for the defendant on limitations grounds. 2 S.W.3d 755.

In light of our recent decisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases