SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents;
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 8, 2001.
June 8, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Johnson & Sedlack, Raymond W. Johnson and Carl T. Sedlack for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Roderick E. Walston, General Counsel, Norman N. Flette and John C. Clairday, Deputy General Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, and William S. Abbey, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent California Department of Fish and Game.
Best, Best & Krieger, Michelle Ouellette, Riverside, and Theresa E. Antonucci, Azusa, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.
OPINION
HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.
In San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v. Metropolitan Water Dist. (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 382, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 836, we reversed a trial court judgment which approved a mitigated negative declaration for a project consisting of the adoption of the Lake Mathews Multiple Species...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.