SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY v. METROPOLITAN WATER

No. E027043.

109 Cal.Rptr.2d 108 (2001)

89 Cal.App.4th 1097

SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents; Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

June 8, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Sedlack, Raymond W. Johnson and Carl T. Sedlack for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Roderick E. Walston, General Counsel, Norman N. Flette and John C. Clairday, Deputy General Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, and William S. Abbey, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent California Department of Fish and Game.

Best, Best & Krieger, Michelle Ouellette, Riverside, and Theresa E. Antonucci, Azusa, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency.


OPINION

HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

In San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v. Metropolitan Water Dist. (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 382, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 836, we reversed a trial court judgment which approved a mitigated negative declaration for a project consisting of the adoption of the Lake Mathews Multiple Species...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases