1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 167 F.Supp.2d
  5. 167 F.Supp.2d 45 (2001)
 

DOE # 1 v. WILLIAMS

No. CIV. A. 01-00407(ESH).

167 F.Supp.2d 45 (2001)

John DOE # 1, et al., Plaintiffs v. Anthony WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 19, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald S. Sullivan, Jr., D.C. Public Defender Service, Robert Leon Wilkins, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

David Jackson Ball, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office Civil Division, Lisa Annette Bell, Office of Corporation Counsel, D.C., Washington, DC, for Defendants.

Arthur Barry Spitzer, Washington, DC, for Movant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, John Does # 1-5, are five individuals required to register as sex offenders pursuant to the District of Columbia's 1999 Sex Offender and Registration Act ("SORA"), D.C.Code § 22-4001, et seq. (2001).1 They attack the constitutionality of the SORA, arguing, inter alia, that it violates the Due Process Clause, the Ex Post Facto Clause and the Double...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases