1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 784 So.2d
  5. 784 So.2d 1276 (2001)
 

STATE v. ALCAZAR

No. 2000-KK-0536.

784 So.2d 1276 (2001)

STATE of Louisiana v. Carl E. ALCAZAR, III.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith R. Credo, Metairie, Counsel for Applicant.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Churita H. Hansell, Gretna, Counsel for Respondent.

KNOLL, Justice.*

This writ concerns whether compliance with LA.REV.STAT. §§ 32:661(C)(1) and 32:666(A), in particular the requirement that prior to testing the officer read the suspect under arrest for driving while intoxicated his right to refuse to take a chemical test, e.g., the Intoxilyzer 5000 test, is a necessary prerequisite for the admissibility of the test results.1 We find that because the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases