PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals an order entered November 9, 2000, nunc pro tunc, February 25, 1999, ordering him placed in aftercare following successful completion of level 6 commitment. We reverse.
The trial court originally ordered Appellant to level 6 commitment. Although recommended by the Department of Juvenile Justice, the trial court made no oral pronouncement of aftercare and did not order aftercare in its written order. A successor judge entered an...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.