PER CURIAM.
Appellant Louie Wright was convicted of dealing in stolen property. At trial, the jury was instructed that "[p]ossession of recently stolen property unless satisfactorily explained gives rise to an inference that the person in possession of the property knew or should have known that the property had been stolen." As Appellant concedes, the issue we certified to the supreme court in Weddell v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.