PER CURIAM.
Thomas Jerome Thomas, the appellant, argues on appeal that the trial court erred in re-sentencing him to a habitual violent felony offender minimum mandatory term after it vacated his prison releasee reoffender mandatory term. We affirm.
Because the trial court vacated the appellant's previous sentence on his one count of attempted first-degree murder, no double jeopardy attached on re-sentencing. See Smith v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
