PICKETT v. SEARS

No. 104, September Term, 2000.

775 A.2d 1218 (2001)

365 Md. 67

Allan M. PICKETT v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 13, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Winters, Frederick, for petitioner.

Ronald S. Canter and Ronald M. Abramson (Harry K. Wolpoff of Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., on brief) Rockville, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, and BATTAGLIA, JJ.


BATTAGLIA, Judge.

Appellant, Allan Pickett, (hereinafter "Pickett"), comes before this Court to challenge the constitutionality of substituted service under Maryland Rule 3-121(c) used in a debt collection action brought by appellee, Sears, Roebuck & Company (hereinafter "Sears"). Pickett argues that Sears's service of process, pursuant to an order of the District Court of Maryland, sitting in Carroll County, failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases