1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 21 P.3d
  5. 21 P.3d 178 (2001)
 

HAYES v. OLMSTED & ASSOCIATES, INC.

(9709-07330; CA A106401)

21 P.3d 178 (2001)

173 Or. App. 259

Dan A. HAYES, Appellant, v. OLMSTED & ASSOCIATES, INC., dba Performance Northwest of Oregon, Respondent, and Arthur K. Olmsted and David P. Arbanas, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 28, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kim T. Buckley, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief were Michael J. Esler, Portland, and Esler, Stephens & Buckley. With him on the reply brief was Esler, Stephens & Buckley.

Susan D. Marmaduke, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was James, Denecke, Urrutia, Marmaduke & Carlton, P.C.

Before WOLLHEIM, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and BREWER, Judge.

BREWER, J.

Plaintiff Dan Hayes brought this action against defendants Arthur Olmstead, David Arbanas, and Olmstead & Associates, Inc. (O & A) for relief from alleged minority shareholder oppression.1 Plaintiff is a former employee, officer, director, and current shareholder of O & A, a successful food brokerage firm. Olmstead and Arbanas are directors and officers of O & A, and together, during the relevant time, held a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases