1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 793 So.2d
  5. 793 So.2d 1188 (2001)
 

D.L.F. v. STATE

No. 3D01-23.

793 So.2d 1188 (2001)

D.L.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 19, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael Neimand (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, and Marni A. Bryson, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. "It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error." A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, on remand, the trial court shall conform the written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases