PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief. We conclude that the trial court erred when it addressed the merits of the appellant's rule 3.850 motion, and reverse.
The appellant filed a previous rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, which was denied on the merits by the trial court. The appellant then filed an appeal of that denial. Because the appeal was still pending before...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
