LIDDLE v. SCHOLZE


768 A.2d 1183 (2001)

Delores LIDDLE, Appellant, v. Denise SCHOLZE and Gary Scholze, Appellees.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed March 2, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Kramer, Washington, for appellant.

Samuel S. Pangburn, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, EAKIN and TAMILIA, JJ.


EAKIN, J.

¶ 1 The emu's a bird quite large and stately, whose market potential was valued so greatly that a decade ago, it was thought to be the boom crop of the 21st century.

¶ 2 Our appellant decided she ought to invest in two breeding emus, but their conjugal nest produced no chicks, so she tried to regain her purchase money, but alas in vain.

¶ 3 Appellant then filed a contract suit, but the verdict gave her claim the boot; thus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases