1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 766 A.2d
  5. 766 A.2d 1103 (2001)
 

PONZO v. PELLE

766 A.2d 1103 (2001)

166 N.J. 481

Karen L. PONZO and Joseph C. Ponzo, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Christopher K. PELLE, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 27, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce H. Nagel, Livingston, argued the cause for appellants (Nagel Rice Dreifuss & Mazie, attorneys; Mr. Nagel and Susan F. Connors, on the brief).

Harry D. Norton, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Norton, Arpert, Sheehy & Higgins, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by LONG, J.

In December 1992, plaintiff Karen Ponzo was stopped in traffic in her vehicle when she was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by defendant Christopher Pelle. Ponzo sued Pelle for negligence. Her husband Joseph Ponzo sued per quod. A five-day trial took place after which a jury returned a no cause verdict in favor of Pelle. Ponzo's motion for a new trial was denied. She appealed and the Appellate Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases