PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.
RAMIREZ, J., dissenting.
I dissent because the state offered no evidence in its case-in-chief that on the day the defendant was arrested for trespassing he was not "authorized, licensed, or invited" to be on the premises. See § 810.09(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999); Seago v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.