PER CURIAM.
We accept the assistant attorney general's commendable concession that the trial court should have considered appellant's facially meritorious motion, albeit filed under Rule 3.800, as one filed under Rule 3.850, and considered the merits. See Hart v. State,
STONE, POLEN and SHAHOOD...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.