BALTAYAN v. ESTATE OF GETEMYAN

No. B136807.

110 Cal.Rptr.2d 72 (2001)

90 Cal.App.4th 1427

Gagik BALTAYAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Maro GETEMYAN, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

July 30, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Philip E. Carey and Philip E. Carey, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of Ira Cohen and Ira Cohen, Agoura Hills, for Defendants and Respondents.


BOLAND, J.*

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Gagik Baltayan's personal injury action was dismissed after he failed to comply with the trial court's order requiring him to post an undertaking pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1030. Appellant argues that the undertaking should not have been required because respondent did not make a sufficient showing that it had a reasonable possibility...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases