1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 767 A.2d
  5. 767 A.2d 1030 (2001)
 

BOROUGH OF BERLIN v. REMINGTON & VERNICK ENGINEERS

767 A.2d 1030 (2001)

BOROUGH OF BERLIN, A Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. REMINGTON & VERNICK ENGINEERS, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 12, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Norman, Tampa, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Norman & Kingsbury, attorneys; Mr. Norman, on the brief).

Ellis I. Medoway, Haddonfield, and Arthur H. Jones, Jr., Glendale, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; Mr. Medoway and Mr. Jones, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LEFELT and AXELRAD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LEFELT, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Borough of Berlin sued defendant Remington & Vernick Engineers ("R & V") for negligence in planning, designing and implementing a municipal water well. R & V moved for summary judgment based on Berlin's failure to comply with N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, the Affidavit of Merit Statute (the "Act"). R & V contended that the affidavit of Frank Getchell, a professional hydrogeologist, did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases