PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the denial of his postconviction motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The trial court correctly found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the appellant's postconviction motion because an appeal from two earlier postconviction motions challenging the appellant's sentence was still pending. See Noto v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.