1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 754 N.E.2d
  5. 754 N.E.2d 1013 (2001)
 

WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. WRIGHT

No. 29A05-0009-CV-403.

754 N.E.2d 1013 (2001)

WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellant-Defendant, v. Ruth Ann WRIGHT, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

September 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George T. Patton, Jr., Bryan H. Babb, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Eric A. Riegner, Locke Reynolds LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Karl L. Mulvaney, Nana Quay-Smith, Candace L. Sage, Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman LLP, James H. Young, Young & Young, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), appeals the trial court's $420,000.00 judgment in favor of Appellee Plaintiff, Ruth Ann Wright (Wright).

We affirm.1

ISSUE

Wal-Mart raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: whether the trial court's Final Instruction 17 was an improper statement of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases