1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 779 A.2d
  5. 779 A.2d 926 (2001)
 

IN RE KITCHINGS

No. 99-BG-1023.

779 A.2d 926 (2001)

In re John H. KITCHINGS, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 30, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Clay Smith, III, Assistant Bar Counsel, with whom Leonard H. Becker, Bar Counsel at the time the brief was filed, for Bar Counsel.

Elizabeth J. Branda, Executive Attorney, for the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Harry Tun, for respondent.

Before RUIZ and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

At the crux of this case lies a dispute between the Board on Professional Responsibility and Bar Counsel over the scope of the latter's authority to resolve cases based on a set of stipulated facts.

Bar Counsel charged John H. Kitchings with fifteen counts of various violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including neglect (Rule 1.3), failure to keep his clients informed (Rule 1.4), and failure to protect a client's interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases