TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN v. MIDDLETOWN PBA LOCAL 124


764 A.2d 940 (2001)

166 N.J. 112

TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, Respondent-Appellant, v. MIDDLETOWN PBA LOCAL 124, Charging Party-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 11, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard M. Reilly, Red Bank, argued the cause for appellant (Dowd & Reilly, attorneys).

Fred M. Klatsky, Red Bank, argued the cause for respondent (Klatsky & Klatsky, attorneys; Michael A. Bukosky, on the brief).

Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 334 N.J.Super. 512, 760 A.2d 326 (1999).

For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O'HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG and VERNIERO—6.

For dismissal as improvidently granted—Justice LaVECCHIA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases