1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 787 A.2d
  5. 787 A.2d 902 (2001)
 

BOROWINSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW

787 A.2d 902 (2001)

346 N.J. Super. 242

William J. BOROWINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW and Spevack & Cannan, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Borowinski, South River, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Alan C. Stephens, Trenton, argued the cause for respondent, Board of Review (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Stephens, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN and AXELRAD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by AXELRAD, J.T.C. (temporarily assigned).

Claimant, William J. Borowinski, Esquire, appeals from the denial of unemployment benefits from February 8, 2000 through March 18, 2000, based on his discharge for misconduct connected with work as a result of refusing a direct instruction from his senior partner to attend a proceeding in evening municipal court on behalf of one of the firm's clients.

Borowinski worked as an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases