STATE v. VOGT


776 A.2d 884 (2001)

342 N.J. Super. 368

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. William J. VOGT, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 25, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank L. Corrado, Wildwood, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent, (Rossi, Barry, Corrado, Grassi & Radell, attorneys; Mr. Corrado, on the brief).

Steven D. Scherzer, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant, (Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys; Michael Gross, on the brief).

Before Judges NEWMAN, BRAITHWAITE and WELLS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BRAITHWAITE, J.A.D.

Following a trial de novo in the Law Division, defendant appeals from his conviction for using property "under the control" of the Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife (the "Division") contrary to regulations established by the Division, N.J.S.A. 23:7-9(d) and N.J.A.C. 7:25-2.5(a)2. Defendant was acquitted of violating the Lower Township anti...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases