1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 242 F.3d
  5. 242 F.3d 1376 (2001)
 

KARSTEN MFG. CORP. v. CLEVELAND GOLF CO.

No. 99-1234.

242 F.3d 1376 (2001)

KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND GOLF COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 22, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Watkins III, Cahill, Sutton & Thomas, PLC, of Phoenix, AZ, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Roger W. Parkhurst, Parkhurst & Wendel, of Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Charles A. Wendel. Of counsel on the brief were Patricia A. Hubbard, Spencer & Hubbard PLC, and C. Randall Bain, Brown & Bain, of Phoenix, AZ.

Before PAULINE NEWMAN and MICHEL, Circuit Judges, and PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Karsten Manufacturing Corporation ("Karsten") appeals the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Arizona,1 construing the claims and, based on the claim construction, ruling that United States Patents Nos. 4,621,813 and 5,193,805 are not infringed and Patent No. 5,297,803 is invalid as to claims 1-8. The judgments of noninfringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases