1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 249 F.3d
  5. 249 F.3d 1356 (2001)
 

INAMED CORP. v. KUZMAK

No. 00-1292.

249 F.3d 1356 (2001)

Inamed Corporation, Inamed Development Company and Bioenterics Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lubomyr I. Kuzmak, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: May 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher E. Chalsen, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Tedd W. Van Buskirk, Lawrence T. Kass, and Michael N. Nitabach.

Kevin R. Klein, Larson & Taylor, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Ross F. Hunt, Jr.

Before CLEVENGER, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Inamed Corp., Inamed Development Co., and BioEnterics Corp. (collectively, "Inamed" or "appellants") appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissing their action for declaratory judgment against defendant Lubomyr I. Kuzmak, M.D., for lack of personal jurisdiction. Inamed Corp. v. Kuzmak, No. 99-2160 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 24, 2000) ("Inamed Corp."). Because we conclude that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases